Thursday : May 15, 2025
09 : 24 : 29 AM
Breaking News

Mumbai will probably play in the playoffs, depending on the weather, while Ahmedabad will host the third IPL final in four years

Backward politics," asserts Dharmendra Pradhan According to a letter, Tamil Nadu agreed to sign an MOU on PM-SHRI schools.

top-news



In a development that has sparked a political controversy, Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan has accused the Tamil Nadu government of engaging in "retrograde politics" by allegedly backtracking on its commitment to sign a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) for the establishment of PM-SHRI (Prime Minister's Schools for Rising India) schools in the state. Pradhan cited a letter from the Tamil Nadu government, which he claims indicates its initial agreement to the central scheme. The accusation has reignited tensions between the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led central government and the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK)-led state government, highlighting the ongoing tussle over education policies and federalism in India.


 The PM-SHRI Scheme: A Central Initiative


The PM-SHRI scheme is a flagship initiative of the central government aimed at upgrading and modernizing schools across the country. The program seeks to transform existing schools into model institutions that provide high-quality education, focusing on holistic development, innovation, and skill-building. The scheme is part of the broader National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, which envisions a revamp of India's education system to meet the demands of the 21st century.


Under the PM-SHRI scheme, selected schools receive funding and support for infrastructure development, teacher training, and the integration of technology in education. The central government has been urging states to sign MoUs to participate in the program, emphasizing the collaborative nature of the initiative.


 Tamil Nadu's Initial Agreement: The Letter in Question


Dharmendra Pradhan's accusation centers on a letter allegedly sent by the Tamil Nadu government, expressing its willingness to sign an MoU for the PM-SHRI scheme. According to Pradhan, the letter, dated October 2023, indicated the state's agreement to participate in the program. However, he claims that the Tamil Nadu government later decided against signing the MoU, citing political reasons.


"The Tamil Nadu government had initially agreed to join the PM-SHRI scheme, as evidenced by their letter. However, they have now chosen to engage in retrograde politics, depriving students in the state of the benefits of this transformative initiative," Pradhan stated during a press conference. He further accused the DMK-led government of prioritizing political vendetta over the welfare of students.


 Tamil Nadu's Stance: Opposition to NEP 2020


The Tamil Nadu government, led by Chief Minister M.K. Stalin, has been a vocal critic of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, which forms the foundation of the PM-SHRI scheme. The state has raised several concerns about the NEP, including its emphasis on a centralized approach to education, the introduction of vocational training at an early stage, and the perceived dilution of the state's autonomy in education matters.


In response to Pradhan's accusation, Tamil Nadu School Education Minister Anbil Mahesh Poyyamozhi stated that the state had not formally agreed to sign the MoU. "We have always been clear about our reservations regarding the NEP and its implications for Tamil Nadu. The central government cannot impose its policies on us without addressing our concerns," Poyyamozhi said. He also questioned the authenticity of the letter cited by Pradhan, suggesting that it may have been misinterpreted or taken out of context.


Political Fallout: A Clash of Ideologies


The controversy over the PM-SHRI scheme is emblematic of the broader ideological clash between the BJP and the DMK. The BJP, which advocates for a strong central government and the implementation of uniform policies across the country, has often faced resistance from regional parties like the DMK, which prioritize state autonomy and the preservation of regional identity.


The DMK has consistently opposed the NEP, arguing that it undermines the federal structure of India and imposes a "one-size-fits-all" approach to education. The party has also criticized the central government for not consulting states adequately before rolling out the policy. "Education is a state subject, and the central government must respect the diversity and unique needs of each state," said a senior DMK leader.


 Public Reaction: Divided Opinions


The controversy has elicited mixed reactions from the public and stakeholders in the education sector. Supporters of the BJP have backed Pradhan's stance, accusing the Tamil Nadu government of playing politics at the expense of students. "The PM-SHRI scheme is a golden opportunity to improve the quality of education in Tamil Nadu. The state government's refusal to participate is a disservice to the people," said a BJP spokesperson.


On the other hand, supporters of the DMK have defended the state government's decision, arguing that it is standing up for the rights of Tamil Nadu. "We cannot blindly accept central policies that do not align with our state's interests. The DMK is right to question the NEP and its implications," said a political analyst based in Chennai.


 The Role of Federalism: A Recurring Debate


The controversy over the PM-SHRI scheme has reignited the debate over federalism in India. Education, as a subject, falls under the Concurrent List of the Indian Constitution, meaning both the central and state governments have the authority to legislate on it. However, the central government's increasing involvement in education policy has been a point of contention for many states, particularly those ruled by opposition parties.


Critics argue that the central government's approach undermines the principles of cooperative federalism, where states and the center work together as equal partners. "The central government must engage in meaningful dialogue with states and address their concerns before implementing policies like the NEP," said a constitutional expert.


The Way Forward: Dialogue and Collaboration


As the standoff between the central and Tamil Nadu governments continues, experts emphasize the need for dialogue and collaboration to resolve the impasse. "Both sides must come to the table with an open mind and a willingness to find common ground," said an education policy analyst. "The ultimate goal should be to provide quality education to students, and that can only be achieved through cooperation."


Some have suggested that the central government could consider making adjustments to the NEP to address the concerns of states like Tamil Nadu. "Flexibility and adaptability are key to the success of any national policy. The central government should be willing to accommodate the unique needs of different states," the analyst added.


A Test of Governance


The controversy over the PM-SHRI scheme and the alleged backtracking by the Tamil Nadu government is a test of governance and political will for both the central and state governments. While the central government seeks to implement its vision for education reform, it must also respect the autonomy and diversity of states. Similarly, state governments must balance their political ideologies with the practical needs of their citizens.


As the debate unfolds, the focus must remain on the students, who stand to benefit the most from initiatives like the PM-SHRI scheme. Only through constructive dialogue, mutual respect, and a commitment to collaborative federalism can India achieve its goal of providing equitable and high-quality education for all. The resolution of this controversy will not only shape the future of education in Tamil Nadu but also set a precedent for center-state relations in the years to come.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Category

Gallery

  • gallery
  • gallery
  • gallery
  • gallery
  • gallery
  • gallery

Tags

Social Media

Related Posts

top-news

According to the Shiv Sena, "modern Duryodhan" Raj Thackeray's ascent in the party was contested by Uddhav Thackeray

top-news

US VP India visit LIVE: Trade on the topic, Modi-Vance talks to start soon

top-news

Rahul Gandhi's EC comment angers Fadnavis, who says it "raises doubts about his character."